Beat reporters: How to respond to an angry community source

An old editor told me once: always pick up the phone, but never apologize until you mean it.

As a beat reporter, you’re going to get feedback from sources—sometimes praise, often critique. That’s a good thing. Sometimes we’re wrong, and hearing feedback helps us correct the record. Our goal is to get it right. But sometimes, the anger directed at reporters isn’t about errors or issues that require action. It’s about emotions, misunderstandings, or disagreements.

Continue reading Beat reporters: How to respond to an angry community source

The Journalist the Murderer

Journalism can only be done adversarially — or immorally.

So argues the 1990 book The Journalist the Murderer by Janet Malcolm, which was first a serialization the year before in New Yorker. The nonfiction book is today considered a seminal work in journalism ethics, and related fields. Though frequently referenced in other works I’ve read, I only now finished the short book.

Malcolm focuses on the relationship between a journalist named Joe McGinniss and a man named Jeffrey MacDonald, who was accused of murdering his wife and children. McGinniss wrote a 1983 bestselling book about the case, which then became a popular movie, but was later criticized for his handling of the relationship with MacDonald, resulting in a high-profile libel case. In short, McGinniss was accused of portraying himself as sympathetic to MacDonald but always planning a damning book. Malcolm takes this narrow example to draw wider conclusions, including the nature of truth and how it is represented in journalism.

Below find my notes for future reference.

Continue reading The Journalist the Murderer

The “Elements of Journalism”

(Image source)

Journalism is a practice largely influenced by those who learn the craft on the job. Despite its well-established impact on communities, there’s a very old debate about whether or how much formal training should be required.

In 1988, ABC anchor Ted Koppel said that “”journalism schools are an absolute and total waste of time.”

Into that fray, the Elements of Journalism has served a breezy foundation for modern journalism. The book, written by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, was first published in 2000, then revisited in 2007 and most recently in a third edition from 2014. I read it once many years ago. I returned to it again, after a conversation I had with Rosenstiel, and found it a helpful resource.

Below I share my own notes, though I strongly recommend it for anyone interested in journalism best practices. I bought copies for the editors at my own organization. It’s an easy and effective read.

Continue reading The “Elements of Journalism”

What is newsroom objectivity?

(This is an expansion of this thread)

When is a news organization being fair to a range of good-faith perspectives, and when is that newsroom retreating from a moral responsibility? When is a reporter taking a partisan stance and when is it a stance for justice?

With the rise of the social web in the last 20 years, this reevaluation of journalistic principle has been frequently described through the lens of newsroom objectivity. It reached a fever pitch in 2020, resulting in an important dialogue on objectivity and “moral clarity” in newsrooms.

This concept was the topic of a session in November 2020 during the virtual 12th annual Klein News Innovation Camp unconference I help organize. I’ve revisited the conversation, and I want to share what I took away.

Continue reading What is newsroom objectivity?

Newsroom objectivity and “moral clarity” are not in opposition

(This is adapted from a Twitter thread)

No, newsrooms don’t need to throw out “objectivity’ as a principle. Yes “moral clarity” should mean something for news organizations.

This thread comes from my own experiences, plus this helpful conversation I had during Klein News Innovation Camp with Alexis Johnson, Tom Rosenstiel and Wes Lowery.

Continue reading Newsroom objectivity and “moral clarity” are not in opposition

News organizations: how do you get throughout feedback from your community?

I assume that the idea of ‘letters to the editor’ was once a representative and effective means for news organizations to receive feedback from their community.

I’m not certain it remains so. For one, those can of course only be sent in for what has already been announced. I also get the sense not many reporters really listened or could gauge the preponderance of feedback.

The rise of quantitative surveying helps, though of course surveys are also not necessarily representative. We at Technically Media do our fair bit of surveying, after events and annually too. We also host regular curated groups of readers and (importantly) those we aspire to be readers of ours.

Continue reading News organizations: how do you get throughout feedback from your community?

Start with the doing. Then get to the done

Big goals can inspire. They can also paralyze.

One of the best outcomes from building the habit of building habits is having a skill to make big change. If you want to stop always being late. If you want to be a better public speaker. If you want to drive your company to new heights.

Once you identify the obstacles, these all are essentially tasks of building habits. But we often stare down the end of an enormous project and are so intimidated we never start. That happens to me a lot. So I remind myself that it all comes down to an incredibly simple act: just get started.

Continue reading Start with the doing. Then get to the done

The difference between reporting about policy and politics

In spring 2008 during my final interview for a prestigious post-graduate statehouse reporting internship, I got tripped up.

The impatient and inimitable Pennsylvania state government correspondent Pete Decoursey, a quirky Yale alumnus who passed in 2014, asked me to explain how I would approach my reporting on policy differently than my reporting on politics. I started. He corrected. I restarted. He interrupted. I faltered.

The truth was I didn’t yet grasp his point. He very carefully compartmentalized two kinds of government reporting: the legislating to solve problems and the campaigning to get elected power.

Continue reading The difference between reporting about policy and politics

What employee counts should mean to reporters

The employee headcount at a company seems like it should be a straightforward metric. It isn’t.

As business reporters, we often use employee counts to gauge a company’s growth, size and priorities. For small, private companies especially, employee counts can be one of the most accessible and telling numbers available. But here’s the catch: Not all “employees” are created equal, and founders have plenty of incentives to inflate those numbers.

This isn’t necessarily about deception. Many founders genuinely believe their extended network of contractors, part-timers, and interns are part of their “team.” And in many cases, that broader team plays a significant role in their business. But as reporters, we need to dig deeper. If we take every headcount claim at face value, we risk misunderstanding a company’s true scale or overstating its growth.

So how do we approach employee counts with both curiosity and skepticism? Here are a few tips:

1. Clarify Full-Time Employees

When a founder shares their headcount, your next question should be: How many of those are full-time employees? This number matters because full-time employees (often salaried, W2 workers) represent a more permanent and sustained commitment from the company. Contractors and part-timers can be scaled up or down quickly, but full-timers are typically a better indicator of a company’s core operations.

For example, at my own company, Technical.ly, we have 19 full-time employees. However, if you include part-timers and contractors, that number rises to 24 people who regularly get a paycheck from us. In some contexts, we might call that a “team of 24,” but I’d expect a diligent reporter to push me on how many of those are full-time staff.

2. Consider Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)

In some industries, particularly those with lots of part-time or seasonal workers, it’s worth asking for the full-time equivalent (FTE) count. This metric translates all the hours worked by part-timers into the equivalent of 40-hour workweeks. For instance, two part-time workers clocking 20 hours a week each would count as one FTE.

FTE is a useful standard because it provides a clearer sense of the company’s overall workforce capacity. Many government and economic reports rely on FTE figures, and they can help normalize comparisons across companies with different staffing models.

3. Be Wary of Inflated Numbers

It’s not uncommon for founders to include anyone remotely connected to the company in their employee count—freelancers, one-off contractors, or even unpaid interns. This can make a company seem much larger than it actually is. While it’s fine to include those numbers in certain contexts, you should always distinguish between core staff and auxiliary contributors.

For example, a founder might proudly claim they have a “team of 400,” but if 380 of those are one-time freelancers, that paints a very different picture than a company with 400 full-time employees.

4. Think About the Narrative

Ultimately, employee counts are a storytelling tool. The number a company shares—and the one you choose to include in your reporting—should match the narrative you’re telling. Is the focus on a company’s growth trajectory? Highlight full-time employees to underscore sustained investment. Covering a gig-based startup? Mention contractors to illustrate its flexible model.

TL;DR: Always Ask the Follow-Up

Employee counts are a valuable metric for understanding a company’s size and priorities, but they require context. Always follow up to clarify:

  • How many employees are full-time?
  • What is the full-time equivalent (FTE) count?
  • Who is included in the broader “team” number?

By asking these questions, you’ll ensure your reporting accurately reflects the reality behind the numbers—and avoid falling for the illusion of scale that an inflated headcount can create.

You’re going to get criticized. Learn when to listen.

One effective way to divide the kind of criticism you’ll get for your work is to split the feedback between that which comes from someone who has done the work you’re doing and that which comes from someone else.

It doesn’t necessarily mean one category will always be effective or helpful or productive or not. Those are further distinctions. But when I’m receiving critical feedback —  on something I’ve written or presented or shared — often the first check I make is that one.

Continue reading You’re going to get criticized. Learn when to listen.