Remarks: Tech meetups shape economic mobility

Below are my notes, and video, from the remarks I offered to kickoff the second day of our Technically Builders Conference, which also doubled as the closing of the 15th annual Philly Tech Week. It informed this story we published on Technically. My slides are here.

Starting in 1975, the Homebrew Computer Club was a regular gathering of tech enthusiasts in northern California.

The group was made famous for inspiring Apple founders Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. But hundreds of computer clubs emerged around the country then. The Philadelphia Area Computer Society (PACS), for example, was first organized in spring 1976.

You don’t have to care about a few dozen computer nerds getting together 50 years ago. How they did has shaped the work we do, though, and has a few lessons for our future.

Continue reading Remarks: Tech meetups shape economic mobility

Keynote: The case for storytelling (for entrepreneur-led economic development)

Below are my notes, and video, from the keynote address I used to kickoff Technically Builders Conference. It informed this story we published on Technically. My slides are here.

Maria Romero has 90 days to find a job — or she gets deported.

In December, the Mexico City native completed her MBA in marketing analytics at Philadelphia’s Drexel University. She’s young, educated, with in-demand skills. The kind of immigrant Americans across the political spectrum say we want.

And yet: Maria is worried. It’s February 2025 when the Technical.ly newsroom first meets her — 30 days left, tick tock tick tock. Higher interest rates have ended the tech hiring boom. Volatility is everywhere. Her STEM degree and F1 visa gives her years to work like any American citizen — no quirky paperwork, not even modest immigrant sponsorship costs. But she’s nervous anti-immigrant rhetoric is making a tough hiring climate worse for her.  Forget about paying bills, if she doesn’t get a job she’ll get kicked out of a city, out of a country, that she was ready to call home.

She applies to more than 500 jobs. She does coffee meetings, texts friends, has her story told by a news outlet and responds to inbound outreach. She also keeps on living — she walks her dog, she goes to restaurants she loves. 

The thing we do before our life changes forever is almost always mundane.

Continue reading Keynote: The case for storytelling (for entrepreneur-led economic development)

Hum

Call the entire industry adversarial tech.

I’ve read almost only nonfiction in recent years. I’ve been quick to drop fiction so much that I don’t try as much — though I’m sure I’ll get back to it at another stage in my life. Yet some fiction does slip in, and so when I stick to it, I know I love it. Such it was with Hum, the near-future science fiction novel by Helen Phillips that uses a world in which newly ubiquitous AI robots dominate modern life to dissect marriage and parenting. It published just back in August.

Says the protagonist mother, who had just lost her job to an AI that she programmed, in reference to her kids: “Whenever she saw beauty, her only thought was that she wanted them to see it.”

Or another line that hit me, a young parent: “Their time here was brief, yes, slipping through their fingers: but it occurred to her that everyday was not twenty-four hours, it was actually ninety-six, each of the four of them living their own twenty-four hours side by side “

Meritocracy should be dismantled

Unsympathetic as they may seem to many, elite workers are stuck in a rotten cycle.

They’ve gotten their status by obsessing over rarified education and lifelong work obsession. They then work to ensure their kids get the same or better advantage, ensuring the system continues.

If a century ago, we saw the end of an aristocratic elite that earned income idly through generational wealth and factories they rarely entered, then today the meritocratic elite earn income working 100 hours a week as a corporate executive, attorney, banker or perhaps true technology leader. There was a time when we thought we solved this: In the 1950s and 1960s, well-intentioned reformers at Ivy League schools introduced a wave of merit-based admissions, which temporarily balanced the scales. But then rich families began to adapt to the rules and now they dominate them.

Rich kids are still more likely to get to elite schools, and then win in elite careers — but they bludgeon themselves with work in a way that their great grandparents wouldn’t have.

This worsens the fate of middle class, who have no chance of breaking into elite educations that are further owned by the rich — not now by hereditary handoffs but by buying elite education — and ensures generational poverty stays so. The elite get the same outcome but at a far higher cost.

That’s the thrust of Yale Law legal scholar Daniel Markovits’s fall 2019 “The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite,” which I just read. Vox review from back then here.

No doubt his timing was tricky. As his book was published the covid-19 pandemic began to swell. It’s taken me this long to come back to the book, though it’s on one of my favorite topics. He wrote in his acknowledgements the book came from years of work, and in the book he says the final push came from this May 2015 commencement address he gave.

He’s a dazzling writer, with some wonderful turns of phrase, but he needs only half of them. I found myself marveling over a pretty sentence, only to notice that he was essentially reasserting the same point he had just made. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the myriad ways he introduced and reintroduced his concepts.

Below I share my own notes from the book for future reference.

Continue reading Meritocracy should be dismantled

Rye whiskey is much harder to make than bourbon

Rye requires more precise temperature control than corn or barley when being passed through a still to produce a spirit to age into a well-liked whiskey.

Cook corn and barley a bit too hot, and there’s more room for error. Do the same with rye, and you end with a burnt mess.

I wrote about this for Men’s Journal here.

“It’s pretty well known that rye can be tricky to work with,” said Herman Mihalich, the chemical engineer turned founder of Dad’s Hat Rye, “and that ranges from small guys to even bigger guys.”

I got this story idea in my head back in March 2024 when I visited my friend’s small micro-distillery (pictured above), and he shared that without more precise temperature control tools he found rye more difficult than bourbon.

Examples of journalism strategy outside news organizations

Journalism is a strategy, not an industry. More verb than noun.

I’ve written for years now about what I called “Journalism Thinking,” and so I cxontinue to collect examples of what I consider acts of journalism produced outside of news organizations. Consider this a place for me to gather these examples for future use.

Continue reading Examples of journalism strategy outside news organizations

My 2024 in review

I closed last year having felt that I set a new normal I hoped to continue in 2024. I was right.

I traveled a bit more, spoke a bit more, wrote a bit more, all while feeling more comfortable as a parent and a bit more certain where my company had to go. Plenty of vulnerabilities remain but I feel more comfortable in my life post-pandemic and post-kid. I am blessed, if challenged.

Below I share the highlights.

Continue reading My 2024 in review

America: A Farewell Tour

In 2018, progressives had an especially dim view of the American project.

The Trump administration — from the “Muslim travel ban” to unfunded tax cuts to the more general corrosion of norms — was considered a destructive symptom of “the toxic brew of American exceptionalism.” The remarkable “special century” of American-led peace, growth and economic prosperity had ended. A subtler decline was made public.

Or as prolific writer and critic Matt Taibbi famously put it back then: “Trump found the flaw in the American Death Star. It doesn’t know how to turn the cameras off, even when it’s filming its own demise.”

That’s from the 2018 book America: A Farewell Tour, written by journalist Chris Hedges. A Pulitzer Prize-winner, Hedges self-identifies as a socialist and has had an outspoken career — leaving the New York Times after his criticism of the Iraq War featured getting booed for a commencement speech. He later contributed to and ran Green Party campaigns.

The book thoughtfully features many in-depth character studies from far-flung corners of American life, from BDSM culture to white supremacy, from sex work to gambling.

“This is the new American capitalism,” he wrote. “It is not about producing products, but escapist fantasies.”

Regardless of whether my politics overlap with his, I respect how Hedges has pursued his sense of truth. He’s at least an independent thinker. This book came in the heat of progressive reaction to the Trump administration. With his second administration starting next month, It felt fitting to return to see how much of Hedges’s 2018 take held up, and what fell flat.

Back then, like as now, he wrote that we were in Gramsci’s interregnum — which the Marxist writer used to describe when an old order has fallen but the new one has not yet come.

“The American empire is coming to an end,” Hedges writes confidently (p. 294). “It will limp along, losing influence and electing diminished leaders. It will lose reserve currency status [Editor’s note: but to whom!?] and falter.” All “within a decade or two”, he writes. This is by no means an optimistic book, and what hope it has is in working people building something better, it is outstripped by Hedge’s antipathy to the established order. I enjoyed the book, and would recommend it to others — I especially appreciated his thoughtful argument against reactionary violence, as a distraction from the work of organizing.

Below find my notes from the book for future reference.

Continue reading America: A Farewell Tour