<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Christopher Wink &#187; Commonwealth Confidential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christopherwink.com/tag/commonwealth-confidential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christopherwink.com</link>
	<description>Sharing my work and writing about media convergence, entrepreneurship and the future of news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#039;Commonwealth Confidential&#039; owns its Google Search, does your newspaper blog?</title>
		<link>http://christopherwink.com/2009/02/14/commonwealth-confidential-owns-its-google-search-does-your-newspaper-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://christopherwink.com/2009/02/14/commonwealth-confidential-owns-its-google-search-does-your-newspaper-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Wink</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Confidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inquirer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christopherwink.wordpress.com/?p=3221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I mentioned the Philadelphia Inquirer&#8217;s Harrisburg bureau Commonwealth Confidential blog didn&#8217;t own its own name in a Web search. Well, a Google search today shows that they got it right now. Why&#8217;d it take so long and what else can we learn? The name of their blog, Commonwealth Confidential, isn&#8217;t in its Web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://media.philly.com/images/harrisburg2.jpg" alt="" width="500" /></p>
<p>Last month <a href="http://christopherwink.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/inquirer-blogs-that-dont-own-their-google-searches/">I mentioned the Philadelphia Inquirer&#8217;s Harrisburg bureau Commonwealth Confidential</a> blog didn&#8217;t own its own name in a Web search.</p>
<p>Well, a Google search today shows that <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Commonwealth+Confidential%22&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">they got it right now</a>. Why&#8217;d it take so long and what else can we learn?</p>
<p><span id="more-3221"></span>The name of their blog, <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/harrisburg_politics/">Commonwealth Confidential</a>, isn&#8217;t in its Web address, which, of course, is a heavy way to help search fields find it. Instead, the address is <a href="http://philly.com/philly/blogs/harrisburg_politics">philly.com/philly/blogs/harrisburg_politics</a>.</p>
<p>That could mean only two things to me. Either, when designed or to date, the Inqy&#8217;s Web people weren&#8217;t so sure about the name and wanted to be flexible.</p>
<p>More likely &#8211; and more hopefully &#8211; they&#8217;re hoping for increased hits via Web searches for &#8220;Harrisburg politics,&#8221; <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;q=%22Harrisburg+politics%22&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=%22Harrisburg+politics%22&amp;fp=Aj_Ggb0OCLs">which they&#8217;ve done just fine</a>. I do wonder if there wouldn&#8217;t be a greater net yield for <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;q=%22Pennsylvania+politics%22&amp;fp=u1f8FedsCOM">searches for &#8220;Pennsylvania politics,&#8221;</a> for which the Inquirer doesn&#8217;t even register, but that isn&#8217;t much the point. There are lessons to be had for every newspaper news blog.</p>
<p>If someone is looking for news on &#8220;Harrisburg politics,&#8221; I wonder if the Inqy wants the yield to be exclusively blog posts, considering from newspapers they are typically extra news not worthy a full-length story. Working with its CMS, I&#8217;d like to see newspapers develop Web sites in which related news stories can run in the same forum.</p>
<p>That is, if I find &#8220;Commonwealth Confidential,&#8221; why aren&#8217;t the Harrisburg bureau&#8217;s stories also available from that RSS stream? That would give one focused tap for &#8220;Harrisburg politics&#8221; and news from the Inqy and would let you show visitors from Web searches to see the best of your content.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, being on a blog essentially called &#8220;Harrisburg politics,&#8221; would only help the Inqy Harrisburg stories steal clicks from the Morning Call, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and other competing Pennsylvania papers, perhaps even the Patriot-News.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll only briefly mention that putting your newspaper stories in an effective blog format would finally give readers simple, <a href="http://christopherwink.wordpress.com/2009/02/09/newspapers-stop-moving-your-online-articles/">permanent links from their Wed address bar, instead of moving stories around as most newspapers foolishly do now</a>.</p>
<p><em>Header courtesy of <a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/harrisburg_politics/">Commonwealth Confidential</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christopherwink.com/2009/02/14/commonwealth-confidential-owns-its-google-search-does-your-newspaper-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
